Richmond’s TE with real in-line value and versatility
I couldn’t verify reliable current data for a Richmond Spiders tight end named Sean Clarke from the provided results, so I can’t responsibly assess his 2026 performance, rankings, or fit. If you meant a different player or a different spelling, send the correct name and I can produce a scouting-style summary focused on production, blocking/value versatility, and any injury or role context that matters for roster fit.
Buck W 35-14 
HOW W 28-21 
NCSU L 0-73 
GTown W 24-21 
Furman W 13-9 Athlete DNA will appear once enough tight end season data has been processed.
–
Not enough data to calculate
Fanstake's Revenue Share Fair Market Value (FMV) is our independent, dynamic estimate of a player's on-field value to college programs. Our model weighs more than a dozen factors — including positional demand, experience, statistical performance, strength of competition, team performance, comparable players, upside potential, and proprietary signals informed by our proximity to college programs — to estimate a player's share of the $20.5M revenue pool schools can now distribute directly to athletes.
FMV is not a disclosure of what a player actually earns. Actual compensation may be higher or lower, and in practice, player packages are often negotiated as a combination of revenue share and NIL opportunities.
The goal of Fanstake FMV is simple: to give fans a transparent, data-driven benchmark for understanding player value in the new era of college athletics.
Percentile among FCS TEs — a longer bar ranks higher
| SEASON | SCHOOL | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 |  | 4 | 16 | 134 | 1 | 8.4 |
| 2025 | | 2 | 6 | 42 | 0 | 7 |
| 2024 | | 4 | 5 | 38 | 1 | 7.6 |
| 2023 | | 13 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 5 |
| CAREER | 24 | 31 | 235 | 4 | 7.6 |
Voting opens when a score is available.